Thursday, August 4, 2016

A full, self-consistent, treatment of thermal wind balance on oblate fluid planets

A full, self-consistent, treatment of thermal wind balance on oblate fluid planets


Galanti et al


The nature of the flow below the cloud level on Jupiter and Saturn is still unknown. Relating the flow on these planets to perturbations in their density field is key to the analysis of the gravity measurements expected from both the Juno (Jupiter) and Cassini (Saturn) spacecrafts during 2016-17. Both missions will provide latitude-dependent gravity fields, which in principle could be inverted to calculate the vertical structure of the observed cloud-level zonal flow on these planets. Theories to date connecting the gravity field and the flow structure have been limited to potential theories under a barotropic assumption, or estimates based on thermal wind balance that allow analyzing baroclinic wind structures, but have made simplifying assumptions. Those include the effects of the deviations from spherical symmetry, the centrifugal force due to density perturbations, and self-gravitational effects of the density perturbations. Recent studies attempted to include some effects but not in a self-consistent manner. The present study introduces such a self-consistent perturbation approach to the thermal wind balance that incorporates all physical effects, and applies it to several example wind structures, both barotropic and baroclinic. The contribution of each term is analyzed, and the results are compared in the barotropic limit to those of potential theory. It is found that the dominant balance involves the original simplified thermal wind approach. This balance produces a good order-of-magnitude estimate of the gravitational moments, and is able, therefore, to address the order one question of how deep the flows are given measurements of gravitational moments. The additional terms are significantly smaller and none of these terms is dominant, so any approximation attempting to improve over the simplified thermal wind approach needs to include all other terms.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.